Hello LawyerLisa. I agree with many of your points, particularly the attempted elimination of First Amendment rights and free speech. My take on the committee process has not changed since about 1986. Definition - Committee: Ten arms, ten legs, five assholes...
My belief is that ALL organizational constructs need to be eliminated across the board, period. A partnership of two individuals is the only valid construct man has ever benefited from. Add a third member and progress is defined by which two are able to override the agenda of the other member. Four person constructs are generally zero net gain. Five members? See above.
When the organizational construct waxes toward an Congress, Parliament, Corporate, or "alleged" Limited Partnership, efficacy is reduced to financial profit margin at the expense of all other moral or ethical considerations. I know mine is not considered a "socially" acceptable model, but socialism has only delivered the clueless proletariat to the gates of an poly incorporated Hell on Earth. Best regards.
I have only recently heard of this term but, the way the US and Canada have allowed their government and judicial processes to be subverted by foreign actors, is that considered DEI ??
I don't believe so. However; these motives and acts should be considered acts of Treason and Subversion against civilian and National sovereignty. Quote: “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly. But the traitor moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the galleys, heard in the very hall of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor – he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and wears their face and their garment, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation – he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city – he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared.” - Marcus Tullius Cicero - (January 3, 106 BC - December 7, 43 BC)
Cicero was assassinated by order of Mark Antony... These 'foreign actors' need to be shot on sight...
She's smart. But she lives in a soviet block country formerly known as Canada.
She's okay....lol
I know slumming it with me haha.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/0-Nj4-M2cxs
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/T4Xb0aZimHU
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/PeHC83T-z_s
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/zE9Lj_XuKQc
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/794cId0sV4E
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/47wQqX0dHkE
https://rumble.com/v6ui36p-biological-attacks-millions-will-die.html
Renata sold out, it all theatre now
Evil https://www.google.com/search?q=diary+of+a+ceo+world+leading+investing+expert+the+big+shift+is+coming&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-ca&client=safari#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:661145f7,vid:ZznpMh0DegE,st:0
Send this to your doctors, church leaders, a wake-up call for democracy!
Hello LawyerLisa. I agree with many of your points, particularly the attempted elimination of First Amendment rights and free speech. My take on the committee process has not changed since about 1986. Definition - Committee: Ten arms, ten legs, five assholes...
My belief is that ALL organizational constructs need to be eliminated across the board, period. A partnership of two individuals is the only valid construct man has ever benefited from. Add a third member and progress is defined by which two are able to override the agenda of the other member. Four person constructs are generally zero net gain. Five members? See above.
When the organizational construct waxes toward an Congress, Parliament, Corporate, or "alleged" Limited Partnership, efficacy is reduced to financial profit margin at the expense of all other moral or ethical considerations. I know mine is not considered a "socially" acceptable model, but socialism has only delivered the clueless proletariat to the gates of an poly incorporated Hell on Earth. Best regards.
I have only recently heard of this term but, the way the US and Canada have allowed their government and judicial processes to be subverted by foreign actors, is that considered DEI ??
I don't believe so. However; these motives and acts should be considered acts of Treason and Subversion against civilian and National sovereignty. Quote: “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly. But the traitor moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the galleys, heard in the very hall of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor – he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and wears their face and their garment, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation – he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city – he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared.” - Marcus Tullius Cicero - (January 3, 106 BC - December 7, 43 BC)
Cicero was assassinated by order of Mark Antony... These 'foreign actors' need to be shot on sight...
Absolutely!! Thank you for the serious reply. In a sort of way, I was just being a smart-ass as a sort of way of dealing with the frustration I feel.