Case Update: Notice of Supplemental Authority - HHS Statement Shows Intent

I filed the Notice of Supplemental Authority below. HHS Secretary Kennedy’s official statement from yesterday asserts that the mRNA injections pose more risk than benefit. The continued distribution of the injections with that knowledge demonstrates intent on behalf of the federal government according to Fla. Stat. 790.166 Weapons of Mass Destruction in my opinion. According to 18 USC 175 CH 10 BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS as well but my case does not involve federal statutes.

On July 22 I filed Surgeon General Ladapo’s research as a Supplemental Authority.

To RECAP if you are not familiar with my case.

I filed my initial Complaint on December 1, 2024 seeking an injunction to prohibit the distribution of mRNA injections in Florida because they violate Fla. Stat. 790.166 Weapons of Mass destruction. I also sought Declaratory Judgements from the Court. The case was dismissed prematurely and I appelaed.

On February 18, 2025, Appellees/Defendants filed a notice stating that they will not file an Answer Brief claiming that neither the Circuit Court nor the Appellate Court had jurisdiction over them because I did not serve them the Summons from the Clerk of the Court when I served the Initial Complaint.

Filing an Answer Brief is discretionary, but it is a risky move not to file an Answer Brief as the Appellate Court may accept my pleadings as fact according to the rules.

The position of the Appellees/Defendants is misguided in my opinion. Partly because the error was not on my end, but also, the Appellate Court has jurisdiction over Circuit Court decisions, which is what they case is about.

The reason I did not serve the Summons with the Complaint is because the Circuit Court dismissed the Case prior to the Clerk issuing a Summons. I filed the Initial Complaint on December 1, 2024, and it was dismissed on December 9, 2024. I actually have 120 days to serve notice on Defendants. This appears a clear violation of the rules. Fortunately, on February 19th, 2025, the First District Court of Appeal issued another ruling were part of the decision reiterated that the Lower Court can’t dismiss a Case prior to notice being served on the defendants Pace v. Dixon, No. 1D2023-2046 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb. 19, 2025).

From my perspective this is a clear procedural error on behalf of the Circuit Court. I am appealing the Circuit Court decision on what I perceive to be 8 errors, but this appears a clear cut error with no room for interpretation from my perspective.

As a result, I filed an Amended Appellate Brief and included this procedural error with the other perceived errors from the Lower Court. I will not attempt to predict how the 1DCA will rule in this case, although, if they use their decision from February as guidance, then that should work in my favor. I expect a Disposition anytime within the next 30 days based on past performance.

The Amended Initial Appellate Brief can be found here.

The Initial Complaint can be found here.

Screen shot of filing and HHS press release below. Document can be downloaded too.

Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism.

Mind Matters and Everything Else is 100% independent. If you appreciate my writing and advocacy and would like to support it, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription or making a donation of any amount. Donations may be sent c/o Joseph Sansone, 27499 Riverview Center Boulevard, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, United States, or make an online donation on Ko-Fi or donate Bitcoin.

Filed Notice Of Supplemental Authority 8 6 2025

292KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download