This from Politico

There are other headlines with the same nonsense.

There is a simple uncomfortable fact that many refuse to acknowledge. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, through their attorney, have been fighting to keep mRNA bioweapon injections on the market in the State of Florida. My case is seeking an injunction to stop the Governor and Attorney General to continue allowing the distribution of mRNA injections and products because they are a bioweapon.

This was my second case and was filed on December 1, 2024. My first case was filed on March 3, 2024.

At any time, once presented with the evidence, they could have signed a consent agreement and removed the shots from the market. Through their attorney, they declined.

As it stands, I lost my appeal and have filed a motion for rehearing en banc (means all 15 appellate justices would weigh in) rehearing, a written decision, and to certify the case as an issue of great public importance before the Florida State Supreme Court.

Read my motion here:

Happy Independence Day! Motion for Rehearing Filed in Sansone V. DeSantis mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Case

I believe I am on strong legal ground. Although, I recognize granting a rehearing motion is uncommon. Still, I have shown the decision conflicts with other case law and the court’s prior decision in this case. We’ll see….

Back to the issue at hand. There are some harsh realities. In 2020 Governor DeSantis did an approximate 5 month lockdown (April-September). The first month was a strict lockdown and then there were phases of lifting sanctions on businesses, etc.

DeSantis has repeatedly lied publicly and claimed that he did not do a lockdown in Florida. That is a lie. It has been repeated so much that people in Florida are actually believing it. In the case of DeSantis, he originally said he would not do a lockdown because that would make him a dictator. Then he turned around and did it.

There is this video, which I have shared before, showing DeSantis falsely stating that 95% of the people in the hospital were the unvaccinated or not fully vaccinated. That was a blatantly false statement.

They backed down on the lockdowns in Florida because it was bubbling up underneath them. People were getting guns pulled on them in Walmart for trying to enforce masks. I got a resolution passed at my county Republican Party designating coerced masks and COVID injections violations of the Nuremberg Code and the 9th Amendment. Then it was reversed. Pressure was building. It was about to explode.

In other words, they managed the situation by blending with it and coopting it. I also think there is a strong argument that states with less restrictive gun laws had shorter lockdowns.

I got my ‘Ban the Jab’ resolution, which designated the C19 injections biological and technological weapons of mass destruction passed in 10 Florida County Republican parties and county parties across the country as well as the Idaho and Arizona GOP.

The Republican Party of Florida, remember the Republican Governor is the de facto head of the Party, tamped down on this effort and pressured county Republican parties not to allow the resolution to come up.

Yet, I got this fund-raising text from Evan Power, the Chairman of the Republican Party of Florida, the guy responsible for my suspension as a county Executive Committee member….

As a county Executive Committee member, I was suspended on December 3, 2024. This prevented me from voting for the new county board, or running should I have had an interest, which I did not. I was allegedly suspended for being a member of the Florida Republican Assembly. The Republican Party of Florida passed a rule stating that you could not be a member of both organizations. My involvement was minimal anyway and I had not attended meetings for months and let my membership expire in September of 2024.

I provided the Republican Party of Florida an affidavit stating as much in a timely manner. Others accused of the same thing were reinstated. I am still suspended despite repeated requests to be reinstated and have yet to be provided with an explanation of why I am still suspended.

I am sure it has nothing to do with my ‘Ban the Jab’ resolutions or my ongoing case to try and stop the Governor and Attorney General from continuing to facilitate biological and technological weapons of mass destruction in the State of Florida, in the form of mRNA injections and products.

The Republican Party of Florida has operated like Democrats seeking to cancel or intimidate anybody that does not obey.

There is a Republican President and Congress. In Florida there is a Republican Governor and legislature. Yet, mRNA injections are still poisoning our people.

Ask yourself a simple question.

Why are mRNA biological and technological weapons of mass destruction still on the market?

In your given state, if your Governor or Attorney General weren’t bought and paid for, then would this be the case?

These people are actors. If they were remotely the real deal, they would have lost everything like those of us fighting to stop this madness. Instead, these politicians are willing participants and are now playing the role of fighting back to raise money before the election and give you a reason to vote for them. It is designed to both get you outraged and also make you feel good as if they will do something about the object of your outrage. I guess this is designed to distract you from the people that you know that have and continue to get health complications, that we are supposed to pretend are not from the COVID shots.

Mass murder is wrong. Both parties are complicit.

GiveSendGo to support my efforts in this case.

Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism.

Mind Matters and Everything Else is 100% independent. If you appreciate my writing and advocacy and would like to support it, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription or making a donation of any amount. Donations may be sent c/o Joseph Sansone, 27499 Riverview Center Boulevard, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, United States, or make an online donation on Ko-Fi or donate Bitcoin.

Share

Refer a friend

Support Dr. Trozzi GiveSendGo here.

Early in 2020, Dr. Trozzi recognized the almost certain likelihood of harm from the COVID injections and mandates. He voluntarily stepped away from his 27 year career as an Emergency Room physician and emergency medicine educator in an effort to inform and protect humanity. He knew we were facing the greatest medical emergency of his lifetime.

This wasn’t a part time commitment. Dr Trozzi put down his stethoscope and committed everything he had to stop this mass poisoning. He sold his house, took a work sabbatical, down-scaled his lifestyle, and worked long hours day after day without an income.

Over the past six years, Dr. Mark Trozzi has been one of the strongest voices in calling out the harms of the COVID vaccine, shedding, masking, social distancing and lockdowns. Dr. Trozzi sacrificed everything he had to protect and alert the public, prevent medical malpractice and illegal medical experiments.

For casting doubt upon the reliability of the Public Health COVID-19 policies, Dr. Trozzi drew the ire of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. They declared him “ungovernable and incompetent” and stripped Dr. Trozzi of his license to practice medicine, this while he was on sabbatical and with no patient complaints.

These punitive actions have resulted in dire financial hardship for Dr. Trozzi and his family, including the loss of his home and all his retirement savings. This in addition to the loss of his life long career and professional reputation. With his savings completely depleted, Dr. Trozzi was forced to file for bankruptcy, which was finalized just a few weeks ago.

Dr. Trozzi wants to continue his work but needs our support to do so.

It is only proper that we share the financial consequences imposed on individuals like Dr. Trozzi who stand up for us. It is not fair that they carry all the consequences of their courageous and ethical actions on our behalf.

For this reason, I’m asking for your assistance to help Dr. Trozzi.

How Funds Will Be Used

All funds will be used, at the discretion of Dr. Trozzi, to continue his ethical mission and to support his family.

Please give generously as the future of our health depends on the efforts of good people like Dr. Mark Trozzi.

Ted Kuntz, President

Vaccine Choice Canada

Support Dr. Trozzi GiveSendGo here.

Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism.

Mind Matters and Everything Else is 100% independent. If you appreciate my writing and advocacy and would like to support it, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription or making a donation of any amount. Donations may be sent c/o Joseph Sansone, 27499 Riverview Center Boulevard, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, United States, or make an online donation on Ko-Fi or donate Bitcoin.

Share

Refer a friend

We discussed the dystopian Orwellian police state emerging in the UK, Europe, and the rest of the world. Digital IDs, Centralized Digital Bank currencies, and more were discussed.

Fiona’s websites are:

MassNonCompliance.com

Covileaks.co.uk

@covileaks on X.

Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism.

Mind Matters and Everything Else is 100% independent. If you appreciate my writing and advocacy and would like to support it, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription or making a donation of any amount. Donations may be sent c/o Joseph Sansone, 27499 Riverview Center Boulevard, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, United States, or make an online donation on Ko-Fi or donate Bitcoin.

Share

Refer a friend

Larry gave specifics on the military challenges the United States faces in the current conflict and how that affects U.S. national security around the world. We also discussed the historical significance of an apparently unwinnable war in Iran.

Larry Johnson’s Substack is LarryCJohnson.Substack.com where you can read regular articles about these and other issues.

Larry Johnson’s website is https://sonar21.com/

Larry C. Johnson Bio:

Larry C. Johnson is a former CIA officer and intelligence analyst, and former planner and advisor at the US State Department’s Office of Counter Terrorism. As an independent contractor, he has provided training for the US Military’s Special Operations community for 24 years.

Since its founding in 1998, Larry has been managing partner of BERG (Business Exposure Reduction Group) Associates LLC, which specializes in investigating money laundering and counterfeit products, as well as providing financial analysis and counter terror strategy.

Larry was a frequent guest on all major US networks from the 1990s to the late 2000s, but made the “mistake” of consistently offering candid insights and honest assessments, without deferring to establishment bias. As waging “Forever Wars” became the singular policy objective of 90% of the nation’s elected officials, and of the entire media, those voices offering independent and unbiased analysis were relegated to the wilderness, Larry’s along with them.

Vilified by the establishment right, left and center, Larry must be doing something right. His take on global security, intelligence and geopolitics is regularly sought by businesses, by non-mainstream media, and by an organic and growing online cooperative of non-partisan dissident journalism and commentary.

In 2024, Larry addressed the United Nations Security Council, and attended the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF). He appears regularly on various news sites, video blogs and independent online channels, including Sputnik, RT, Judging Freedom, Redacted and The Duran, among many others.

Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism.

Mind Matters and Everything Else is 100% independent. If you appreciate my writing and advocacy and would like to support it, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription or making a donation of any amount. Donations may be sent c/o Joseph Sansone, 27499 Riverview Center Boulevard, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, United States, or make an online donation on Ko-Fi or donate Bitcoin.

Share

Refer a friend

Call Congress and politely, but firmly let your House of Representative member, and both your U.S. Senators know that support for NDAA Section 219, and Intelligence Act Bill Section 622, equates to treason against the United States of America.

These blackmailed and intimidated politicians need to fear the people more than their masters. There are more of us than them!

As I previously posted from military.com:

NDAA Section 219 creates a permanent “Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative” between the United States and Israel. This section mandates the integration of U.S. and Israeli defense research, development, testing, and production across highly sensitive domains, specifically including artificial intelligence, autonomous weapons systems, cyber capabilities, and biotechnology.

And also posted from military.com:

Section 622 of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027 mandates the expansion of intelligence sharing between the United States and Israel across multiple intelligence domains, including signals intelligence (SIGINT), human intelligence (HUMINT), and geospatial intelligence (GEOINT). Section 622 does not merely authorize intelligence sharing, it requires it. The provision mandates that the Director of National Intelligence, the CIA Director, and the NSA Director expand and maintain intelligence sharing with Israeli counterpart agencies.

Section 622 restricts the President’s ability to suspend or reduce this intelligence sharing absent a specific, narrowly defined national security waiver, a restriction that transforms a discretionary executive function into a statutory obligation and imposes procedural burdens on the President’s exercise of his core foreign affairs authority. Section 622 contains no warrant requirement, no probable cause standard, no minimization procedures for United States person information, and no judicial oversight mechanism of any kind.

Most people we know will have shortened lifespans because of the mRNA bioweapon injections. These same Congressional maggots that participated in poisoning your family members are now literally facilitating the systemic overthrow of our government.

Israel targets and assassinates civilians it deems a threat. Israel will use this intelligence to target and assassinate American citizens at large. Patriots will be targeted more than they already are.

It is bad enough that Congress and the President are betraying America and using the U.S. military as a mercenary force for Israel. This enmeshment of U.S. military forces and intelligence will create an existential threat to American liberty and cause geopolitical destabilization.

What exactly will Israel do with U.S. intelligence?

No sane person can support this. A foreign rogue government with illegal nuclear weapons will have control over American military and intelligence operations. Yes control. The enmeshment of U.S. military and intelligence with Israel is a far greater threat to U.S. autonomy than any foreign power could ever pose.

The President is already bullied by Israel. These bills will make that a systemic permanent situation.

Attorney, David Meiswinkle. President of NationalArm.org asked me to share the message below.

Save the Republic
Stop the Merger with Israel

(Second article in the series)

Congressional Switch Board: 202-224-3121

Call your Senator and Congressional Representative and tell them to
oppose the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), House version Section 219 and Senate Section 1217; and to strip those sections from the National Defense Authorization Act Bill.

These Bills Could Go To The Floor This Week For A Vote. So Call ASAP!

Tell your family and friends to do likewise. Please share this email.

This Act would give Israel access as equal partners to the United State’s multi-trillion-dollar defense and intelligence system. The proposed merger would end our national sovereignty.

Even more so than today. Israel’s problems would become our problems. Their wars our wars. This would be a permanent entanglement.

They would be legislated partners at the highest levels in most sensitive and key defense and intelligence areas including:

• Directed energy and advanced sensing

• Cyber defense, electronic warfare and digital resilience

• Missile and air defense technologies

• Artificial Intelligence, quantum, machine learning and autonomous systems

• Biotechnology, biomanufacturing and medical defense

• Network Integration, data fusion and contested logistics

• Defense industrial base cooperation, manufacturing, and co production

• Counter-unmanned systems including aerial, maritime, and ground platforms

• Anti-tunneling and subterranean threats

• Other emerging technologies, as jointly agreed by the United States and Israel

This is very serious. The opposition to this legislation could unite our country both Left and Right in our effort to keep the United States, and its citizens, sovereign and free of entanglements.

Tell your family and friends to contact their legislators by phone, email, and tag them in social media. Please share this email.

David Meiswinkle,
President,
National American Renaissance Movement

Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism.

Mind Matters and Everything Else is 100% independent. If you appreciate my writing and advocacy and would like to support it, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription or making a donation of any amount. Donations may be sent c/o Joseph Sansone, 27499 Riverview Center Boulevard, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, United States, or make an online donation on Ko-Fi or donate Bitcoin.

Share

Refer a friend

Ret. Airforce Major Thomas Haviland and Funeral Director/Embalmer Richard Hirschman stopped by Mind Matters and Everything Else with Dr. Joseph Sansone to discuss two new peer reviewed journal articles regarding the whit fibrous blood clots that started appearing in cadavers coinciding with the release of the COVID 19 bioweapon injections.

Major Haviland has been conducting surveys of embalmers since 2022 and was able to get this work published in a peer review journal along with Laura Kasner and Daniel Santiago.

Self-Reported Observations of Unusual White Fibrous Structures in Embalmed Corpses: Multi-Year Survey Results from Embalmers in Five Countries, 2022–2025

Funeral Director/Embalmer Richard Hirschman has been blowing the whistle since 2021 on the unnatural white fibrous blood clots being pulled out of cadavers. Richard provided the blood clots for this study showing published by Daniel Santiago; Greg Harrison; Miklós Veres; Mark File; Dennis Planner; showing that the blood clots contain amyloid proteins.

Raman spectroscopic Characterization of Anomalous Intravascular Fibrous Casts: Evidence for Stage-Dependent β-sheet Enriched Protein Maturation

Together these studies show that the fibrous blood clots are a global phenomenon and that they are in fact real, meaning they are not a byproduct of the embalming process.

The percentage of people walking around with these type of clots is unknown, but as we discuss, at least 20% of cadavers have them and Mr. Hirschman is reporting up to 50% of cadavers have these unnatural white fibrous blood clots.

Hopefully one of the results of these studies will be that vascular surgeons start speaking out about this phenomenon.

Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism.

Mind Matters and Everything Else is 100% independent. If you appreciate my writing and advocacy and would like to support it, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription or making a donation of any amount. Donations may be sent c/o Joseph Sansone, 27499 Riverview Center Boulevard, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, United States, or make an online donation on Ko-Fi or donate Bitcoin.

Share

Refer a friend

Christopher Crowley, a Florida attorney and prosecutor, ran for State Attorney in the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in 2017. Crowley, the loser in a Republican Primary race then was on the recipient end on what many considered politically motivated and frivolous charges by the Florida Bar. During the campaign he made numerous public statements criticizing his opponent, Amira Fox, including allegations concerning her conviction record, handling of criminal cases, alleged interference with a grand jury, alleged involvement in Crowley’s criminal arrest during the campaign, and allegations of being corrupt.

The Florida Bar charged Crowley with violating Rule 4-8.2(a), which prohibits lawyers from making statements they know to be false, or make with reckless disregard for the truth, concerning the qualifications or integrity of candidates for judicial or legal office. A referee found that Crowley had violated the rule and recommended a 60-day suspension.

The principal issue was whether the First Amendment permits The Florida Bar to discipline a lawyer for allegedly false campaign speech made during a partisan election for State Attorney. The attempt to censor and discipline Crowley’s speech appears part of a larger strategy to use regulatory agencies and licensing boards to censor the free speech of professionals as enunciated in Attorney Lisa Miron’s book World On Mute.

The Florida Supreme Court held that applying Rule 4-8.2(a) to Crowley’s campaign speech violated the First Amendment.

The Court rejected the referee’s recommendation and declined to impose discipline.

The Court’s analysis rested on several constitutional principles.

1. Political campaign speech receives the highest constitutional protection.

The Court emphasized that speech concerning candidates for elected office lies at the core of First Amendment protection. It quoted numerous United States Supreme Court decisions recognizing that debate over the qualifications of candidates is fundamental to self-government.

2. Rule 4-8.2(a) is a content-based restriction.

The Court explained that the rule regulates speech based on its content because it only applies to statements regarding a candidate’s “qualifications or integrity.”

Since enforcement depends upon examining what the speaker said, the rule is a content-based regulation of speech, triggering strict scrutiny, the highest level of constitutional review.

3. The Bar failed strict scrutiny.

To survive strict scrutiny, the Bar had to prove a compelling governmental interest, and that the rule was narrowly tailored. The Bar argued that disciplining Crowley was necessary to preserve confidence in the judicial system.

The Court disagreed. Although protecting confidence in the judiciary can justify restrictions involving judges or ongoing litigation, the Court concluded that this interest was insufficient when applied to campaign speech in a partisan election for State Attorney.

4. State attorneys are politicians, not judges.

A major theme of the opinion is the distinction between judicial candidates and candidates for partisan legal offices.

The Court noted that candidates for State Attorney run in partisan elections, may affiliate with political parties, receive political endorsements, solicit campaign contributions, and campaign on controversial political issues.

Judicial candidates, by contrast, are subject to unique ethical restrictions designed to preserve judicial neutrality.

Because State Attorney races are political elections, the Court concluded that restrictions appropriate for judicial elections cannot automatically be extended to prosecutors.

5. Even inaccurate or offensive campaign speech is often protected.

The Court expressly acknowledged that Crowley’s statements could have been inaccurate, offensive, or misleading.

Nevertheless, the First Amendment protects robust political debate, requiring tolerance of even harsh and insulting speech during elections. The Court relied on U.S. Supreme Court precedent emphasizing that open political discussion requires “breathing space.”

Other disciplinary charges

The Bar also alleged violations of Rules 4-8.4(a) and 4-8.4(d).

The Court rejected both:

Rule 4-8.4(d) did not apply because Crowley’s campaign activities were not connected with the practice of law.

Rule 4-8.4(a) depended upon a violation of Rule 4-8.2(a), so once that claim failed, this charge also failed.

Justice Muñiz’s concurrence

Justice Muñiz agreed with the result but observed that the Court could potentially have resolved the case by interpreting Rule 4-8.2(a) differently rather than reaching the constitutional question.

He suggested the Bar and the Court should consider amending the rule in light of evolving First Amendment jurisprudence.

Significance

This decision establishes that attorney campaign speech is fully protected by the First Amendment when made during partisan elections for legal offices such as State Attorney; attorney disciplinary rules restricting such speech are subject to strict scrutiny; preserving confidence in the judicial system is not, by itself, a sufficient justification for restricting political speech in partisan campaigns; lawyers do not lose ordinary First Amendment protections simply because they are licensed professionals. For Florida constitutional and attorney-discipline law, the case marks a significant limitation on The Florida Bar’s ability to sanction lawyers for political campaign speech outside the courtroom.

This case will likely restrict the ability or other professional boards to restrict political speech involving political campaigns and activity.

Opinion Sc2020 0529

159KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Prior Stories on This Case:

Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism.

Mind Matters and Everything Else is 100% independent. If you appreciate my writing and advocacy and would like to support it, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription or making a donation of any amount. Donations may be sent c/o Joseph Sansone, 27499 Riverview Center Boulevard, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, United States, or make an online donation on Ko-Fi or donate Bitcoin.

Share

Refer a friend

Murray explained that with an honest money supply the cost of goods and services naturally decrease over time. It is only due to the conditioning to the effects of a fraudulent money supply for over a century that Americans think inflation is natural.

Deviation from our Constitutional framework was seen as a big causative factor whether addressing the welfare state or the warfare state. We also discussed the Israeli overthrow of the Untied States government via the current NDAA and Intelligence Act bills.

Murray also discussed his podcast Health, Wealth, and the Pursuit of Happiness and his interview with billionaire Robert Luddy, an entrepreneur that built his business in North Carolina starting with $1000. Luddy applied the principles of Austrian Economics to his business model.

Murray Sabrin, PhD, is emeritus professor of finance, Ramapo College. He is the author of Finance of Health Care; Navigating the Boom/Bust Cycle, and From Immigrant to Public Intellectual: An American Story, was published in November, 2022. Dr. Sabrin’s substack is https://murraysabrin.substack.com

Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism.

Mind Matters and Everything Else is 100% independent. If you appreciate my writing and advocacy and would like to support it, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription or making a donation of any amount. Donations may be sent c/o Joseph Sansone, 27499 Riverview Center Boulevard, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, United States, or make an online donation on Ko-Fi or donate Bitcoin.

Share

Refer a friend

In the Sansone V. DeSantis mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Case, a Motion for Rehearing En Banc, Motion for Rehearing, Motion for Written Decision, and Request to Certify to the Florida Supreme Court as an issue of great public importance was filed tonight. The downloadable pdf and screen shot are below.

The case is in Florida’s First District Court of Appeal. The 1DCA Per Curium Affirmed (PCA) the Trial Court’s decision to dismiss the case. This is an affirmation of the Trial Court’s decision without a written decision. It essentially blocks the ability to take the case to the State of Florida’s Supreme Court. If this motion is denied this case is likely over. Although, because this PCA conflicts with other appellate case precedents and this court’s prior decision in this same case, there is still a narrow window to take the case to the Supreme Court of Florida. Although, it is discretionary for the Supreme Court to take it up without a written decision to appeal so it is unlikely if this motion is denied. I detail these inconsistencies in the motions below.

The Trial Court case under appeal was an attempt to seek an injunction to stop Governor Ron DeSantis and Attorney General James Uthmeior from continuing to facilitate the distribution of biological and technological weapons of mass destruction in the form of mRNA injections and products.

Click on this article and follow the links in it if you are not familiar with the case.

EXCLUSIVE BREAKING NEWS: Sansone Files Reply Brief Fighting to Stop DeSantis from Continuing to Facilitate MRNA Biowarfare Against Floridians, in Sansone V. DeSantis MRNA Bioweapons Case

GiveSendGo to support my efforts in this case.

Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism.

Mind Matters and Everything Else is 100% independent. If you appreciate my writing and advocacy and would like to support it, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription or making a donation of any amount. Donations may be sent c/o Joseph Sansone, 27499 Riverview Center Boulevard, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, United States, or make an online donation on Ko-Fi or donate Bitcoin.

Share

Refer a friend

251763944 Motion For Rehearing Rehearing En Banc (1)

177KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Read this article and follow links to get up to speed on the case.

EXCLUSIVE BREAKING NEWS: Sansone Files Reply Brief Fighting to Stop DeSantis from Continuing to Facilitate MRNA Biowarfare Against Floridians, in Sansone V. DeSantis MRNA Bioweapons Case

The decision was per curium affirmed which means the 1DCA did not provide a written decision and merely affirmed the lower court’s decision. Without a written decision it is very difficult to appeal to the Florida Supreme Court. It is my view that this decision runs contrary to the facts of the case and the law. I believe I should have clearly won this appeal on several issues articulated in my appellate brief and certainly received a written decision.

I have 15 days to file a motion for rehearing, which I will of course do.

A pdf of the ORDER and screen shot are below.

Opinion Disposition 7 2 2026

55.6KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

GiveSendGo to support my efforts in this case.

Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism.

Mind Matters and Everything Else is 100% independent. If you appreciate my writing and advocacy and would like to support it, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription or making a donation of any amount. Donations may be sent c/o Joseph Sansone, 27499 Riverview Center Boulevard, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, United States, or make an online donation on Ko-Fi or donate Bitcoin.

Share

Refer a friend

Died Suddenly's Substack

From the team of filmmakers and investigators who brought you the viral film Died Suddenly

By Died Suddenly News

https://diedsuddenly.info/

https://x.com/DiedSuddenly_

I am severely shadow banned. Share my articles and videos please.

Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism.

Mind Matters and Everything Else is 100% independent. If you appreciate my writing and advocacy and would like to support it, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription or making a donation of any amount. Donations may be sent c/o Joseph Sansone, 27499 Riverview Center Boulevard, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, United States, or make an online donation on Ko-Fi or donate Bitcoin.

Share

Refer a friend

After the interview both Djamila and Malue stated that they forgot to share about Save Europe Act and asked me to link to it here: https://www.save-europe-act.com/ If you are European it is vitally important to sign this petition to force the European parliament to take up the issue of stopping non European immigration to Europe.

Mass unfettered migration is a tool that has been used for decades as a form of ethnic cleansing of Western civilization (USA, Canada, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand) and to destroy social cohesion making these countries easily controlled and dismantled.

It is also now being employed in non western countries to break up social cohesion.

BIO - for Malue Montclairre:

Peaceful Rebel and Freedom activist. Trauma therapist and founder of my own noetic methodology. Lecturer. Founder and Chair of the Danish Freedom Movement. Co-Founder of Nordic Coalition and NorthGroup. DK Ambassador for Dr. Reiner Fuellmich. Independent Citizen Journalist.
Website:

https://peacefulrebel.live

Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/PeacefulRebelLive

X: @BackupMalue (& @MMontclairre when released by X)

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/malue.montclairre

Eva Vlaardingerbroak’s campaign, Save Europe Act:

https://www.save-europe-act.com/

BIO - Djamila le Pair Independent Dutch journalist, who felt obliged to help fill the void left by mainstream media from 2020. Focus is on such topics as ‘pandemic’ measures, geopolitics and political prosecutions – covering cases such as those of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange; the Corona Investigative Committee co-founder and German lawyer Dr Reiner Fuellmich; the Dutch proceedings against Bill Gates, Albert Bourla and many others; and hearings against NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte.

My website:

https://pinchofsoot.nl

My YouTube account: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCioAvGY-LrFqmcU0FXUIL3w/videos

X: @DjugglinTJail

Here is the link to the Save Europe Act:

https://www.save-europe-act.com

I am severely shadow banned. Share my articles and videos please.

Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism.

Mind Matters and Everything Else is 100% independent. If you appreciate my writing and advocacy and would like to support it, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription or making a donation of any amount. Donations may be sent c/o Joseph Sansone, 27499 Riverview Center Boulevard, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, United States, or make an online donation on Ko-Fi or donate Bitcoin.

Share

Refer a friend

NDAA Section 219 creates a permanent “Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative” between the United States and Israel. This section mandates the integration of U.S. and Israeli defense research, development, testing, and production across highly sensitive domains, specifically including artificial intelligence, autonomous weapons systems, cyber capabilities, and biotechnology. Section 219 also establishes a joint institutional framework, an empowered Executive Agent at the Pentagon with precedence authority over other DoD components, and a permanent cooperative structure that operates outside the standard arms export control framework of the Arms Export Control Act and the Foreign Assistance Act.

Israel is not even a NATO ally, has not signed the NATO Status of Forces Agreement, is not a member of the Five Eyes intelligence alliance, and is not a formal treaty ally of the United States. Yet Section 219 mandates a level of defense industrial and technological integration that exceeds what the United States maintains with its formal treaty allies.

Section 622 of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027 mandates the expansion of intelligence sharing between the United States and Israel across multiple intelligence domains, including signals intelligence (SIGINT), human intelligence (HUMINT), and geospatial intelligence (GEOINT). Section 622 does not merely authorize intelligence sharing, it requires it. The provision mandates that the Director of National Intelligence, the CIA Director, and the NSA Director expand and maintain intelligence sharing with Israeli counterpart agencies.

Section 622 restricts the President’s ability to suspend or reduce this intelligence sharing absent a specific, narrowly defined national security waiver, a restriction that transforms a discretionary executive function into a statutory obligation and imposes procedural burdens on the President’s exercise of his core foreign affairs authority. Section 622 contains no warrant requirement, no probable cause standard, no minimization procedures for United States person information, and no judicial oversight mechanism of any kind.

This great betrayal of America is highlighted by the DIA’s “Critical” Espionage Threat Assessment. The United States Defense Intelligence Agency has formally assessed the threat of Israeli espionage against United States persons and defense personnel as “critical”, the highest threat level in the DIA’s assessment framework. The DIA’s assessment documents specific incidents in which Israeli intelligence surreptitiously installed surveillance software on the devices of United States defense personnel. The DIA’s “critical” threat assessment is the official finding of the United States government’s own premier military intelligence agency. It is not a partisan allegation or an advocacy claim. It is the government’s own authoritative conclusion about the threat that Israeli intelligence poses to American citizens and American national security. Despite this official assessment, Sections 622 and 219 mandate that the United States permanently share intelligence with, and integrate its military systems into, the Israeli defense establishment, without any safeguards against the use of that intelligence to surveil or target American citizens.

Israel openly targets and associates private citizens it deems a threat. It has also engaged in hostilities against the United States. The USS Liberty is a clear example. The risk of armed conflict and lethal engagement between United States and Israeli forces is not a hypothetical proposition, it is a matter of historical record. On June 8, 1967, Israeli aircraft and torpedo boats attacked the USS Liberty, a clearly marked United States Navy intelligence vessel operating in international waters. The attack killed 34 American servicemembers and wounded 171 others. The attack demonstrates that the constitutional capacity to respond to hostilities with Israel must be preserved, not structurally surrendered.

This historical precedent is compounded by a contemporary pattern of lethal force against Americans. Since 2022, at least nine United States citizens have been killed by Israeli forces or settlers. None were charged with any crime, afforded any judicial process, or provided any opportunity to contest the basis for the use of lethal force against them. None of the perpetrators have faced criminal prosecution.

There is of course the likely involvement or knowledge of the Mossad on September 11, 2001, World Trade Center attacks.

This pattern of conduct, the killing of American citizens without due process, without criminal charges, and without accountability, is not a series of isolated incidents. It is a documented, ongoing practice by the foreign government with which the United States is being statutorily required to integrate its intelligence and military systems.

Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution vests the entirety of the executive power in the President. The management of foreign intelligence relationships, including the decision of what intelligence to share, with whom, and under what conditions, is a core executive function that falls within the President’s exclusive constitutional authority. Forcing future Presidents to share intelligence with Israel violates this basic Constitutional principle.

Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution provides that the President “shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur.” The Framers designed this supermajority requirement to ensure deliberate, broad-based consensus before the United States undertakes binding international commitments. Although, I would argue that the framers of the Constitution never envisioned such lunacy and that even a treaty can not ratify treason.

Both Section 622 and Section 219 create permanent, institutionalized, and structurally integrated international cooperation frameworks with a foreign sovereign that are, in substance and practical effect, binding international commitments of the kind the Treaty Clause was designed to govern. They were enacted by simple majority vote without Senate ratification by a two-thirds supermajority.

Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 of the Constitution vests in Congress the exclusive power to “declare War.” This constitutional grant of power is structural and belongs to each successive Congress. The Supreme Court has routinely upheld this principle. This Congress can not bind a future Congress in this manner. Congress is effectively prospectively nullifying a future Congress’s ability to exercise its Article I war powers.

In the event of a conflict, such as the documented June 8, 1967 Israeli attack on the USS Liberty that killed 34 American servicemembers, a congressional declaration of war would require the United States to simultaneously shut down shared AI systems, sever real-time intelligence feeds, disable integrated missile defenses, and identify Israeli-origin components in U.S. programs of record. This disentanglement would take years and leave the United States militarily paralyzed in the interim.

The Fifth Amendment provides that no person shall be “deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” The Supreme Court has recognized that the Due Process Clause “specially protects those fundamental rights and liberties which are, objectively, deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition.” The right not to be killed by the government, or by a foreign government acting with U.S. government assistance, without charge, trial, or judicial process is the most deeply rooted such right.

Mandating the sharing of intelligence and the integration of targeting-capable systems with a foreign government (Israel) that has killed at least nine American citizens since 2022 without charge, trial, or judicial process, a statutory scheme that creates a substantial and foreseeable risk of enabling the deprivation of life without due process of law, in violation of the Fifth Amendment is being created. These statutes use the government’s authority to create a mandatory intelligence sharing framework that provides Israeli intelligence with an opportunity to identify, surveil, and potentially target American citizens.

The Fourth Amendment protects “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” These statutes empower Israeli intelligence, without any warrant requirement, probable cause standard, minimization procedures for U.S. person information, or judicial oversight mechanism. This mandatory sharing of comprehensive intelligence data with a foreign government that is an active espionage threat against Americans constitutes an unreasonable search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment

Section 622’s mandatory intelligence sharing regime imposes a severe and objectively reasonable chilling effect on Plaintiff’s members’ First Amendment activities. Americans can reasonably fear that their communications, associations, and advocacy will be shared with Israeli intelligence, a foreign intelligence service that the DIA has formally assessed as a “critical” espionage threat against Americans and that has a documented record of targeting and killing individuals who are publicly critical of Israeli government conduct.

Israel will operate outside of judicial oversite and with no restrictions afforded by the Bill of Rights. No FOI request. No accountability. Israel is bribing, blackmailing, and intimidating members of Congress to move this legislation.

It is not enough that these bills get stopped. Those promoting the bills and funding them must be investigated for treason against the United States of America.

The only way this attempted overthrow of the United States does not occur is if members of both Houses of Congress and the Executive branch fear American citizens more than they do Israeli mobsters. On the 250^th year anniversary of the Declaration of Independence paragraph two needs to be reviewed.

I am severely shadow banned. Share my articles please.

Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism.

Mind Matters and Everything Else is 100% independent. If you appreciate my writing and advocacy and would like to support it, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription or making a donation of any amount. Donations may be sent c/o Joseph Sansone, 27499 Riverview Center Boulevard, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, United States, or make an online donation on Ko-Fi or donate Bitcoin.

Share

Refer a friend

Read more

Why do psychopathic authoritarians continue to come to power across time and culture?

To date, one of the most important books of the 21st century, Psychopathic Authoritarianism: A Disease of the Soul, is a landmark work of political psychology that identifies, names, and explains the psychological engine driving authoritarian systems throughout human history, and operating in full force today.

Drawing on clinical psychology, history, philosophy, sociology, and spiritual inquiry, author Joseph Sansone, M.S., PhD, proposes a bold and original framework: authoritarian systems are not merely political phenomena, but psychological ones, driven by a specific cluster of personality pathologies. Applying the Dark Tetrad of Sadism, Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy to individuals and societal systems, Dr. Sansone demonstrates how these traits shape destructive leader-follower dynamics across civilizations. Together, these four traits form the psychological profile of the psychopathic authoritarian, an archetype that has appeared in every culture and every century, rising to power through manipulation, cruelty, fear, and the systematic exploitation of human weakness.

Using historical and contemporary examples, Dr. Sansone demonstrates how each element of the Dark Tetrad manifested during the COVID tyranny era through lockdowns, mandates, propaganda campaigns, censorship, psychological manipulation, and the targeting of civilian populations with deadly medical interventions. The book further examines how psychopathic authoritarianism operates not only through individual leaders, but through institutions, media, academia, finance, and the emerging globalist technocratic agenda, including digital surveillance systems, depopulation programs, technocracy, transhumanism, and the erosion of national sovereignty.

The book then asks the deeper question that most works in this genre never reach: why does this pattern recur throughout all of human history? Drawing upon scientific theories, psychological constructs, philosophy, and spiritual concepts, Dr. Sansone proposes that psychopathic authoritarianism is a habitual behavioral field encoded within the fabric of nature itself, a disease of the soul spread through normalization, reward, fear, coercion, and the corruption of human empathy, conscience, and spiritual connection.

Historically significant, psychologically serious, culturally urgent, spiritually consequential, and civilizationally relevant, Psychopathic Authoritarianism: A Disease of the Soul is essential reading for anyone seeking to understand and survive the defining crisis of the modern era.

Publication Date September 11, 2026.

Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism.

Mind Matters and Everything Else is 100% independent. If you appreciate my writing and advocacy and would like to support it, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription or making a donation of any amount. Donations may be sent c/o Joseph Sansone, 27499 Riverview Center Boulevard, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, United States, or make an online donation on Ko-Fi or donate Bitcoin.

Share

Refer a friend

COVID Unmasked Part 1

COVID Unmasked Part II

COVID Unmasked Part III

COVID Unmasked Part IV

Our conversation focused on where we stand several years after the COVID tyranny era, the continuing advance of what I call psychopathic authoritarianism, and whether public awareness is growing fast enough to counter it.

Steve and I agreed that two seemingly contradictory developments are happening simultaneously. On one hand, the push toward centralized control, mass surveillance, artificial intelligence, digital identification, programmable money, and technocratic governance continues to accelerate. On the other hand, more people than ever are waking up to what is happening. Steve expressed cautious optimism, noting that resistance to data centers, surveillance systems, and technologies such as Flock cameras is bringing together an unusually broad coalition of people from different political backgrounds. He believes that opposition to mass surveillance may become one of the strongest unifying issues of our time.

We discussed how many people have become skeptical because they have personally witnessed the consequences of the COVID tyranny and the bioweapon injections. Steve pointed to growing public awareness and the increasing number of individuals who now question official narratives. We both agreed that many people are no longer willing to blindly trust government agencies, pharmaceutical companies, media institutions, or political figures.

A major theme of our discussion was the nature of power and control. Steve argued that money alone does not explain the actions of ruling elites. We discussed how wealth and power are important motivations, and there is also a deeper element of evil, sadism, and domination for its own sake. We explored how some individuals seem driven not merely by profit, but by an apparent desire to control and harm others. Steve emphasized that one of the greatest mistakes people make is assuming that those in positions of authority are rational or psychologically healthy.

We also examined the role of technology in the emerging control grid. We discussed AI data centers, digital surveillance systems, biometric identification, 5G and 6G infrastructure, satellite tracking capabilities, and the possibility that future crises, whether plandemics, cyberattacks, energy shortages, or wars, could be used to justify further restrictions on personal freedom. We discussed how technological advancements have given centralized power structures capabilities that previous generations of authoritarians could only dream about.

At the same time, Steve stressed that technology cuts both ways. The internet and alternative media have enabled unprecedented communication among ordinary people. Information that once would have been hidden can now spread globally within hours. This has made it much harder for authorities to maintain complete control of public perception.

We spent considerable time discussing politics and the danger of placing faith in political saviors. Steve argued that people repeatedly make the mistake of investing their hopes in individual politicians, only to be disappointed. We discussed Donald Trump, the political establishment, and the broader tendency of citizens to trust leaders who promise reform but ultimately reinforce existing power structures. Steve compared this pattern to Charlie Brown repeatedly trusting Lucy not to pull away the football.

Another major topic was the growing concentration of power in both government and large corporations. Steve argued that genuine free markets and local self-governance have been replaced by monopolistic systems dominated by giant institutions. We discussed the importance of local action, community organization, sheriffs, city councils, and other decentralized forms of civic engagement as potential counterweights to centralized authority.

Steve concluded by emphasizing that victory is not guaranteed, but neither is defeat. He believes we are living through a pivotal moment in history, what he described as being beyond the eleventh hour and already in overtime. While the challenges are enormous, he remains convinced that ordinary people still have the ability to change the outcome if they become informed, engaged, and willing to act.

Overall, our conversation was a wide-ranging examination of freedom, technology, political power, human nature, and the growing struggle between centralized control and individual liberty.

Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism.

Mind Matters and Everything Else is 100% independent. If you appreciate my writing and advocacy and would like to support it, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription or making a donation of any amount. Donations may be sent c/o Joseph Sansone, 27499 Riverview Center Boulevard, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, United States, or make an online donation on Ko-Fi or donate Bitcoin.

Share

Refer a friend

1: a group (such as an organization or religious sect) with tenets and practices regarded as coercive, insular, or dangerous

This first definition fits the idea of a cult that most of …

Read more

Note: About 20 minutes in we lost power at my office building for a couple minutes which is why you see an edit there when everything froze up.

Hrvoje Moric, of GeopoliticsandEmpire.com and GeopoliticsandEmpire.Substack.com stopped by Mind Matters and Everything Else with Dr. Joseph Sansone to explore the broader geopolitical and technological implications of the war with Iran, the accelerating push toward digital technocracy, and what we both see as the transformation of global governance structures. I opened the discussion by arguing that the United States and Israel had effectively launched a second Pearl Harbor style attack on Iran within six months, and that many people failed to recognize that America’s defeat in the conflict revealed significant weaknesses in American military and geopolitical power. Hrvoje framed the conflict not as an isolated regional war, but as part of a larger transition toward what he described as a multipolar system of regional technocratic blocs connected under an emerging form of world governance.

Throughout the conversation, we discussed how the war in Iran appeared to function as a continuation of many of the same policies and mechanisms introduced during the COVID era tyranny. Hrvoje argued that the conflict was facilitating energy rationing, inflation, digital controls, and economic restructuring worldwide. We talked about rising fuel and food prices, targeted “smart lockdowns” in countries such as Pakistan, and the growing use of digital payment systems and QR-code restrictions tied to energy access. I connected these developments to programmable digital currencies and warned that centralized digital finance would allow governments and corporations to control when, where, and how people spend money.

A major theme of the interview was the emergence of what Hrvoje called “regional technates”, blocs such as a North American Union, a Middle Eastern Union, or a Eurasian Union that would eventually integrate into a broader global governance structure. We discussed how the weakening of American military dominance, especially in the Middle East, appeared to support this transition. Hrvoje argued that conflicts in Ukraine and Iran were accelerating the shift from a unipolar American empire toward a multipolar technocratic order administered through institutions such as the IMF, World Bank, World Economic Forum, and regional alliances.

We also examined the role of digital systems and surveillance technologies in this transformation. Hrvoje expressed skepticism about Bitcoin, arguing that it may ultimately function as part of a larger digital control architecture rather than a genuine alternative to centralized finance. We discussed the growing convergence of governments, financial institutions, and technology companies around AI governance, biometric identification systems, digital identity verification, and algorithmic management of society. Hrvoje described this emerging model as “algocracy”, rule by algorithms and artificial intelligence.

The conversation then shifted toward the broader strategic role of China, Russia, Cuba, Venezuela, and Mexico within this evolving system. Hrvoje argued that the Western global establishment was attempting to integrate remaining holdout nations into a unified digital-technocratic order, either through economic pressure or military coercion. We discussed how instability in Mexico, cartel violence, and government corruption could potentially be used as justification for future intervention or deeper North American integration. Hrvoje suggested that similar dynamics were unfolding in Cuba and Venezuela as part of a long-term restructuring of the Americas.

Another important topic was the changing nature of warfare itself. We discussed how drone and missile technology were rapidly replacing traditional military systems such as aircraft carriers and large standing armies. Hrvoje argued that World War III, in a practical sense, may already be underway, not only as conflicts between nations, but more fundamentally as a war of governments and transnational elites against their own populations. We connected this to the expansion of surveillance systems, digital identity infrastructure, military AI, and autonomous technologies.

Toward the end of the interview, we discussed the economic consequences of these developments, including inflation, food insecurity, and the destruction of the entrepreneurial middle class. Hrvoje argued that even without a full-scale global famine, escalating inflation alone could permanently price ordinary people out of economic independence and ownership. I emphasized that war, scarcity, and instability create ideal conditions for the consolidation of political and technological control.

Overall, the interview focused on the idea that current geopolitical conflicts cannot be understood in isolation. Instead, we argued that wars, economic crises, digital currencies, AI systems, and energy disruptions are all interconnected components of a broader transformation toward centralized global technocratic slavery/governance.

Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism.

Mind Matters and Everything Else is 100% independent. If you appreciate my writing and advocacy and would like to support it, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription or making a donation of any amount. Donations may be sent c/o Joseph Sansone, 27499 Riverview Center Boulevard, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, United States, or make an online donation on Ko-Fi, or donate Bitcoin.

Share

Refer a friend

A major portion of our discussion focused on Ebola, COVID-19, PCR testing, and emergency use authorizations. Dr. Laibow described her views regarding Ebola outbreaks in Africa, alleging connections between government research, biosecurity laboratories, and what she characterized as weaponized viral research.

Note: Dr. Rima Laibow provided an expert affidavit in my case stating that mRNA nanoparticle injections are bioweapons.

She also discussed her experience promoting nanosilver as a treatment during the Ebola outbreak in Sierra Leone and Liberia, claiming that international organizations obstructed those efforts. We talked extensively about the COVID-19 tyranny era, the rollout of mRNA injections, the use of PCR testing, and the legal framework surrounding emergency use authorization. Dr. Laibow argued that alternative treatments had to be discredited in order for emergency authorizations to proceed.

From there, we shifted into a broader conversation about fear-based public messaging and what we both viewed as ongoing attempts to prepare populations psychologically for future plandemics and expanded systems of social control. We discussed Hantavirus specifically, including its transmission through rodents and contaminated droppings, while also questioning the absurdity of narratives amplified through media and government. Dr. Laibow and I discussed the manipulation of fear to normalize surveillance, restrictions, and centralized authority.

The conversation then expanded into food systems, agriculture, and global governance. We discussed concerns about engineered food scarcity, attacks on farming and fertilizer production, and the possibility of famine being used as a mechanism of social control. Dr. Laibow spoke about Alpha-gal syndrome and genetically engineered ticks, arguing that food systems and meat consumption are increasingly being targeted as part of a broader agenda tied to organizations such as the World Economic Forum and the United Nations. I connected this to my own observations about ideological messaging in higher education regarding sustainability and population reduction.

We discussed the nature of psychopathy and authoritarianism. We discussed my concept of “psychopathic authoritarianism” depicted in my upcoming book, Psychopathic Authoritarianism: A Disease of the Soul (soon to go to editor) and how individuals with psychopathic traits can present themselves as compassionate, trustworthy, and socially adaptive while concealing manipulative or destructive intentions. Dr. Laibow shared personal experiences from her own life to illustrate how difficult it can be to recognize psychopathic behavior, even for highly intelligent and psychologically aware individuals. Together, we explored how these personality structures might manifest in institutions, governments, and global systems of power.

We also discussed the psychological invisibility of extreme pathology to ordinary people. Dr. Laibow argued that most people cannot easily comprehend the mindset of individuals who lack empathy, morality, or attachment to human rights, and that this makes populations vulnerable to manipulation by charismatic authority figures and institutions. We tied this into broader concerns about globalism, mass surveillance, “15-minute cities,” centralized governance, and what we described as the erosion of constitutional protections and individual sovereignty.

Toward the end of the interview, we focused on geopolitical instability, economic disruption, food shortages, and energy scarcity. We discussed how the Iran war, sanctions, supply chain disruptions, and attacks on agriculture could converge into what Dr. Laibow described as a “perfect storm” involving famine, disease, and social destabilization. She argued that these crises are interconnected and designed to push populations toward dependency on centralized systems.

Finally, Dr. Laibow spoke about her advocacy work through PreventGenocide2030.org and encouraged political action aimed at resisting what she sees as expanding global governance structures. Throughout the interview, we returned repeatedly to the importance of recognizing authoritarian dynamics, questioning institutional narratives, and understanding the psychological mechanisms involved in mass media brain washing and and social control.

Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism.

Mind Matters and Everything Else is 100% independent. If you appreciate my writing and advocacy and would like to support it, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription or making a donation of any amount. Donations may be sent c/o Joseph Sansone, 27499 Riverview Center Boulevard, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, United States, or make an online donation on Ko-Fi, GiveSendGo, or donate Bitcoin.

Share

Refer a friend

Yesterday, May 15, 2026, Florida’s First District Court of Appeal (1DCA) denied Oral Argument in Case 1D2025-3368 - Sansone V. DeSantis and Uthmeir mRNA Bioweapons Case. Sansone

Read more